| 1 |
On 24/08/10 22:21, Joshua Saddler wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Christian Faulhammer<fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Hi, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Joshua Saddler<nightmorph@g.o>: |
| 8 |
>>> The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked |
| 9 |
>>> stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc |
| 10 |
>>> files. |
| 11 |
>> Is there a list of the needed changes? |
| 12 |
> Read the OpenRC guide, then read all our other guides. That's the list. It will require a line-by-line code scan to figure all this stuff out. Creating such a list would probably take almost as long as actually fixing the docs. |
| 13 |
I don't think that the documentation changes should be a determining |
| 14 |
factor in switching to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC, |
| 15 |
the more relevant issues are the ones regarding its future development. |
| 16 |
The documentation can be updated in due time. Of course, that's just my |
| 17 |
opinion. |
Archives