1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
The following are just my opinions/summaries: |
4 |
|
5 |
1) It appears that the most dissatisfied devs are those |
6 |
who have been proponents of the "enterprise" aspect |
7 |
of gentoo. When they say that not much has been |
8 |
accomplished in the last 2 years, I think you have to |
9 |
look at it from the enterprise point of view. GLEP19 |
10 |
never got anywhere. Other than small improvements, |
11 |
I'm not sure anything positive has happened. If anything, |
12 |
Gentoo appears to be heading more in the "desktop" |
13 |
and "hobbyist" direction. That might be what they mean |
14 |
when they say gentoo is becoming irrelevant. |
15 |
|
16 |
Therefore, I think the devs who favor the desktop stuff |
17 |
just really arent understanding how the enterprise devs |
18 |
have been disillusioned here. Certainly, there is alot of |
19 |
cool stuff happening in gentoo on the hobbyist and desktop |
20 |
side. |
21 |
|
22 |
2) Although the "future discussion" doesnt seem to be bringing |
23 |
devs any closer together, I saw at least a few decent suggestions |
24 |
that we should follow up on. |
25 |
|
26 |
- Have a planned annual developers conference |
27 |
I think this is critical, I would be willing to help with the implementation |
28 |
if it gets the green light. |
29 |
|
30 |
- Consider the possibility of eventually redefining gentoo entirely as a metadistribution |
31 |
and have devs more formerly broken up into different teams of enterprise, desktop, etc |
32 |
devs where the eventual product might be seperate trees or release media for each |
33 |
team. |
34 |
On the surface, this is appealing to me, but the implementation details are |
35 |
probably impossible. |
36 |
|
37 |
I would also like to thank kurt and lance for throwing out their thoughts on this subject, even |
38 |
when their is quite alot of resistance. |
39 |
|
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
MattM |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |