| 1 |
maillog: 07/06/2007-19:42:45(+0200): Marius Mauch types |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:32:40 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper |
| 7 |
> > > upstream name and name referenced in every single doc in the world |
| 8 |
> > > is "ntfs-3g". I tried to rename the package however, Portage does |
| 9 |
> > > not let me since it is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed |
| 10 |
> > > me it's invalid with PMS as well. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage |
| 13 |
> > > and PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the |
| 14 |
> > > version information. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Would this cause problems anywhere if we had the following? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > sys-fs/ntfs/ntfs-3g.ebuild |
| 19 |
> > and |
| 20 |
> > sys-fs/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g-1.516.ebuild |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You |
| 23 |
> don't know unless you actually check the tree. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Isn't "sys-fs/ntfs-3g" the atom and "=sys-fs/ntfs-3g-1.516" the CPV? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
/ Georgi Georgiev / Meader's Law: Whatever happens to you, it / |
| 29 |
\ chutz@×××.net \ will previously have happened to everyone \ |
| 30 |
/ http://www.gg3.net/ / you know, only more so. / |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives