Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should skype have check_license function? The eula is missing also from license_groups?
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:03:42
Message-Id: 4B3F331E.5060606@gentoo.org
1 On 01/02/2010 01:28 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
2 > ssuominen 10/01/02 11:28:37
3 >
4 > Modified: skype-eula
5 > Log:
6 > Update Skype's EULA from 2.1.0.47
7 >
8 > Revision Changes Path
9 > 1.2 licenses/skype-eula
10 >
11 > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/skype-eula?rev=1.2&view=markup
12 > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/skype-eula?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
13 > diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/skype-eula?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
14
15 I'm not a lawyer, but it looks like Skype's ebuilds should force users
16 to agree the end user agreement?
17
18 -- cut --
19
20 inherit eutils
21
22 pkg_setup() {
23 check_license
24 }
25
26 -- cut --
27
28 Also, note that skype-eula isn't listed [1] in license_groups in profiles/
29
30 [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296801
31
32 Thanks, Samuli