From: | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should skype have check_license function? The eula is missing also from license_groups? |
Date: | Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:03:42 |
Message-Id: | 4B3F331E.5060606@gentoo.org |
1 | On 01/02/2010 01:28 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote: |
2 | > ssuominen 10/01/02 11:28:37 |
3 | > |
4 | > Modified: skype-eula |
5 | > Log: |
6 | > Update Skype's EULA from 2.1.0.47 |
7 | > |
8 | > Revision Changes Path |
9 | > 1.2 licenses/skype-eula |
10 | > |
11 | > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/skype-eula?rev=1.2&view=markup |
12 | > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/skype-eula?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain |
13 | > diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/licenses/skype-eula?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 |
14 | |
15 | I'm not a lawyer, but it looks like Skype's ebuilds should force users |
16 | to agree the end user agreement? |
17 | |
18 | -- cut -- |
19 | |
20 | inherit eutils |
21 | |
22 | pkg_setup() { |
23 | check_license |
24 | } |
25 | |
26 | -- cut -- |
27 | |
28 | Also, note that skype-eula isn't listed [1] in license_groups in profiles/ |
29 | |
30 | [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296801 |
31 | |
32 | Thanks, Samuli |