| 1 |
El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 22:02 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 4 |
> >> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 |
| 5 |
> >> Pacho Ramos<pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 8 |
> >>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 9 |
> >>>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 10 |
> >>>>>> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
| 11 |
> >>>>>> herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think |
| 12 |
> >>>>>> we should drop that herds and move their packages to |
| 13 |
> >>>>>> maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
| 14 |
> >>>>>> |
| 15 |
> >>>>>> What do you think? |
| 16 |
> >>>>>> |
| 17 |
> >>>>> |
| 18 |
> >>>>> The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
| 19 |
> >>>> |
| 20 |
> >>>> and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
| 21 |
> >>> |
| 22 |
> >>> Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
| 23 |
> >>> - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
| 24 |
> >>> reflect reality) |
| 25 |
> >>> - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
| 26 |
> >>> |
| 27 |
> >>> The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages |
| 28 |
> >>> to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
| 29 |
> >> |
| 30 |
> >> For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, |
| 31 |
> >> removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping |
| 32 |
> >> the herd. |
| 33 |
> >> |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > OK but, what about the rest? ;) |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Please leave at least media-optical@ be as it is. Changing it doesn't |
| 38 |
> make any sense. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Well, the idea would be to get their bugs assigned to maintainer-needed |
| 43 |
and media-optical CCed if somebody wants to take that stuff someday, it |
| 44 |
would reflect better reality as, currently, their bugs are being |
| 45 |
assigned to an empty herd (yes, xarthisius (I think he was in alias but |
| 46 |
not officially in herd last time I checked, anyway it's only one |
| 47 |
example, nothing personal against him of course :)). What will occur |
| 48 |
when he simply drops his mail from alias as he never wanted to be a |
| 49 |
member of that herd? What would occur if he only wants to maintain some |
| 50 |
packages but others are getting ignored? |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
The idea to get them moved to "orphan" is to reflect reality and, that |
| 53 |
way, try to get developers (or users willing to proxy maintain them) |
| 54 |
involved on exact apps they really want to keep maintained. |
Archives