| 1 |
On Qui, 2009-12-03 at 15:06 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le 03/12/2009 02:22, Jeremy Olexa a écrit : |
| 3 |
> > Can parallel init script startup be made the default yet? I've been |
| 4 |
> > running with it for months and never noticed a problem.. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I've been running it for more than a year on half a dozen boxes, without |
| 7 |
> any issues as well. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> +1 for making it the default. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Thanks |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I just migrated my laptop to openrc-0.5.2-r2 along with baselayout-2.0.1 |
| 15 |
and sysvinit-2.87-r1 . |
| 16 |
[as user] Everything went smoothly and without problems. I spotted two |
| 17 |
things during boot though: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
* Autoloaded 0 module(s) |
| 20 |
* device-mapper uses addon code which is deprecated |
| 21 |
* and may not be available in the future. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
and |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
* Adding routes |
| 26 |
* 127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1... |
| 27 |
* Adding static routes... |
| 28 |
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Looking at the routing table we have: |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface |
| 33 |
127.0.0.0 - 255.0.0.0 ! 0 - 0 - |
| 34 |
127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 lo |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Why do we need a reject route for 127.0.0.0? Packets with destination |
| 37 |
127.0.0.0 going through interfaces other than lo aren't dropped anyway? |
| 38 |
Does the loopback interface need a gateway set? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Regards, |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX |
| 43 |
Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer |
| 44 |
Linwizard Developer |
| 45 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix |
| 46 |
http://miknix.homelinux.com |
Archives