Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:38:32
Message-Id: 26924B32-9D3E-4B0D-B527-C90E5DBC8B82@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree by Christoph Mende
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4
5 Am 12.06.2007 um 13:29 schrieb Christoph Mende:
6
7 > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:59:42 +0200
8 > cilly <cilly@××××××××××.nu> wrote:
9 >
10 >> On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:53 PM, cilly wrote:
11 >> Additional:
12 >>
13 >> Sometimes the chance for the users to place the ebuild comfortably
14 >> into overlay is simply taken, since the ebuild has been removed and
15 >> doesn't exist after a sync anymore.
16 > It's not, CVS keeps every ebuild around, just go to sources.gentoo.org
17 > and hit "Show X dead files" in the dir of the ebuild you want ;)
18
19 The problem is rather that the patches are gone from the distfiles
20 mirror after two weeks. The sources often stay upstream, but could
21 also be gone.
22
23 Is there an archive for these files I missed?
24
25 Robert
26
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
29
30 iD8DBQFGcACzyZx3L/ph1soRAutQAKCMQ2f6nCzoXgATbIPTO6sbTv32ugCeP+JP
31 tqC13Sfmy1t30jU6aCWgZug=
32 =A832
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>