| 1 |
Ah... wonderful, makes complete sense in the case of the broken xawtv |
| 2 |
ebuild. Glad to have that cleared up, thanks =) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:20:35 +0100 |
| 5 |
Paul de Vrieze <gentoo-user@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> No a -x86 keyword means that the package is tested and found not to |
| 8 |
> work. Untested packages on an arch get no keywords. Packages that are |
| 9 |
> tested by ONE developer on his own arch get a ~x86 keyword. When there |
| 10 |
> is reasonable confidence that the package doesn't break anything (and |
| 11 |
> isn't broken itself) the ~ is removed and we have a package that is |
| 12 |
> considered stable for x86. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Paul |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> -- |
| 17 |
> Paul de Vrieze |
| 18 |
> Junior Researcher |
| 19 |
> Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 20 |
> Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives