| 1 |
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:34:14PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 06:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Due to how CVS hooks operate, it's not quite possible. |
| 4 |
> > You wouldn't be able to block the entire commit, only the contents of |
| 5 |
> > the files/ directory would get totally blocked. |
| 6 |
> > If you were committing an ebuild along with a patch, this would be very |
| 7 |
> > bad, as the ebuild+Manifest would get committed, but the patch wouldn't. |
| 8 |
> Bleh... CVS vs. SVN. There's no "pre-commit" equivalent on CVS? |
| 9 |
There is pre-commit, but it's not recursive. It gets applied to only a |
| 10 |
single directory and in isolation from the other directories. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Also, wouldn't the second Manifest run "fix" the missing digest commit? |
| 13 |
In what way? the problem I was concerned about was non-digest files |
| 14 |
not being committed leading to broken ebuilds. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy |
| 19 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 20 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives