| 1 |
On 07/08/13 11:46, Kacper Kowalik wrote: |
| 2 |
> Not so hypothetical situation: someone files a bug: "Fancy KDE mail |
| 3 |
> program fails with my gcc", you fix it and live happily ever after. |
| 4 |
> How on earth am I supposed to find it when porting/stabilizing newer |
| 5 |
> version of gcc? |
| 6 |
> I expect (as many others) something similar to "=kde-base/kmail-4.8.10 |
| 7 |
> fails to build with gcc-4.8" |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I deeply respect the work of people who fix bugzilla subjects to conform |
| 10 |
> to "atom: issue" format. It saves me a great deal of time. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+1, all package related bugs should be with $summary of |
| 13 |
'=category/package-version: problem' |
Archives