1 |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
2 |
<chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Dean Stephens schrieb: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>> Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it |
6 |
>>> a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member |
7 |
>>> of comrel to vote in the appeal? If it isn't, it is at least a pretty |
8 |
>>> strong perception that it is. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>> Why? How? Exactly what sort of conflicting interest is supposed to be |
11 |
>> present? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I think in Comrel vs. Council is not a conflict of interest, but rather |
14 |
> throwing the appeals process off balance. Can you expect someone to neutrally |
15 |
> review material and actions (question the authenticity of evidence, identify |
16 |
> potential misconduct, etc.) that they themselves used to build the case |
17 |
> against the reprimanded? |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
I hope that Comrel does not consider it their main duty to build cases |
21 |
against community members. They're supposed to investigate, mediate, |
22 |
and take action if necessary. They aren't prosecutors. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Rich |