Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: mgorny@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:36:54
Message-Id: 20568.20091.816189.902403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal by "vivo75@gmail.com"
1 >>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, vivo75@gmail com wrote:
2
3 > Il 18/09/2012 11:38, Ulrich Mueller ha scritto:
4 >> Which is longer than the original.;-)
5
6 > RDEPEND=">=sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4 >=app-arch/bzip2-1.0.2 app-arch/xz-utils"
7 > DEPEND="${RDEPEND} virtual/pkgconfig"
8 > DEPENDENCIES=">=sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4 >=app-arch/bzip2-1.0.2
9 > app-arch/xz-utils" dep:build?(virtual/pkgconfig)"
10
11 Omitting the whitespace around the parentheses? This isn't legal
12 syntax for a dependency specification:
13 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/4/pms.html#x1-780009.2>
14
15 Neither does it improve readability.
16
17 Brian's claim was that dependencies would "collapse down naturally on
18 their own", which isn't the case in his example.
19
20 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>