Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:00:17
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants by "Michał Górny"
On 09/16/2011 10:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: > >>> PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because x86_32 >>> x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont have different >>> keywords for different mips abis (64bit and 32bit ones) >> that'd be nice :) > Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend to keyword > packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64 only; amd64 users > tend to get sad when someone keyworded a package '~x86' only. > > On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords then. > Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually x86-only. >
I guess there are only a few cases where a package should be keyworded for eg x86, but not for amd64, so these few cases can be handled by p.masks, right? So, we can have a single x86 keyword, and a single x86 'parent' profile, and subprofiles for x86(or x86_32), amd64, and x32. I guess it's not that simple, but I think that's how the mips profiles work? -- Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@g.o>


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>