Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPEND definition in docs differ from official PMS specs | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:08:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1232269653.28710.40.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPEND definition in docs differ from official PMS specs by Marius Mauch |
||
| 1 | Marius Mauch schrieb: |
| 2 | > It's strongly recommended to set both explicitly |
| 3 | |
| 4 | FYI, I've opened bug to add repoman check for this: |
| 5 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255358 |
| 6 | |
| 7 | /me also had feeling that it's good idea to rely on implicit RDEPEND and |
| 8 | since it's not true, it's better to warn developers about that. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Peter. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPEND definition in docs differ from official PMS specs | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |