1 |
Am 15.03.2012 00:37, schrieb Greg KH: |
2 |
> Not really, I don't think we support systems without udev anymore, |
3 |
> right? And we get away with a lot of these different "options" at |
4 |
> compile time, which makes it easier than what Debian has to handle, so |
5 |
> perhaps it's not a fair comparison. |
6 |
|
7 |
Sure Gentoo does support such systems... |
8 |
|
9 |
# equery g virtual/dev-manager |
10 |
* Searching for dev-manager in virtual ... |
11 |
|
12 |
* dependency graph for virtual/dev-manager-0 |
13 |
`-- virtual/dev-manager-0 amd64 |
14 |
`-- sys-fs/udev-171-r5 (sys-fs/udev) amd64 |
15 |
`-- sys-apps/busybox-1.19.3-r1 (sys-apps/busybox) amd64 [mdev] |
16 |
`-- sys-fs/devfsd-1.3.25-r9 (sys-fs/devfsd) [missing keyword] |
17 |
`-- sys-fs/static-dev-0.1 (sys-fs/static-dev) amd64 |
18 |
`-- sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin-9.0 (sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin) |
19 |
[missing keyword] |
20 |
[ virtual/dev-manager-0 stats: packages (6), max depth (1) ] |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
/martin |