Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Gysel <m.gysel@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:14:43
Message-Id: 4F61A4AC.4050300@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! by Greg KH
1 Am 15.03.2012 00:37, schrieb Greg KH:
2 > Not really, I don't think we support systems without udev anymore,
3 > right? And we get away with a lot of these different "options" at
4 > compile time, which makes it easier than what Debian has to handle, so
5 > perhaps it's not a fair comparison.
6
7 Sure Gentoo does support such systems...
8
9 # equery g virtual/dev-manager
10 * Searching for dev-manager in virtual ...
11
12 * dependency graph for virtual/dev-manager-0
13 `-- virtual/dev-manager-0 amd64
14 `-- sys-fs/udev-171-r5 (sys-fs/udev) amd64
15 `-- sys-apps/busybox-1.19.3-r1 (sys-apps/busybox) amd64 [mdev]
16 `-- sys-fs/devfsd-1.3.25-r9 (sys-fs/devfsd) [missing keyword]
17 `-- sys-fs/static-dev-0.1 (sys-fs/static-dev) amd64
18 `-- sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin-9.0 (sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin)
19 [missing keyword]
20 [ virtual/dev-manager-0 stats: packages (6), max depth (1) ]
21
22
23 /martin