1 |
07.07.2022 11:27, Martin Kletzander пишет: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:03:04PM -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: |
3 |
>> I've been rather busy lately and can't keep up with all of my packages. |
4 |
>> There are pending bumps, some bugs, but nothing too crazy or hard. |
5 |
>> So I'm looking for someone to co-maintain (or even take over if you |
6 |
>> insist) the following packages: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Noob question, I would have to be a Gentoo developer/maintainer to help |
10 |
> with that, am I right? |
11 |
|
12 |
Don't worry, proxied maintainers can easily (co-)maintain packages too. |
13 |
|
14 |
>> * app-shells/fish |
15 |
>> Responsive upstream, not very frequent releases, cmake. Requires some |
16 |
>> attention on non-x86 as arch bugs are rather frequent. But nothing too |
17 |
>> crazy. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Since I do not have any experience with official maintainership I would |
21 |
> hesitate to commit to anything I am not a user of, but I do use fish and |
22 |
> keep an eye on releases a bit (which I would do more, of course). |
23 |
> |
24 |
> [...] |
25 |
> |
26 |
>> PS. Huge bonus if you can test packages not only on x86_64. |
27 |
>> Ofc I can help with some gotchas in packages and have no plans on |
28 |
>> abandoning those completely, but realistically I'm not doing enough to |
29 |
>> keep those properly maintained at the moment. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I can test that every now and then and even fix some possible issues, |
33 |
> hopefully. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Let me know if I can be of help or whether I should rather go through |
36 |
> proxy maintainers or another route. |
37 |
|
38 |
It's possible for a particular developer to be the proxy, and it's |
39 |
possible for p-m project to be proxies for the proxied maintainers. |
40 |
|
41 |
> |
42 |
> Have a nice day, |
43 |
> Martin |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
Best regards, |
49 |
Alexey "DarthGandalf" Sokolov |