Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ssuominen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:59:48
Message-Id: 20120311190024.52c9a3a8@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 by Samuli Suominen
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:35:36 +0200
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:

> On 03/11/2012 07:33 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:28:41PM -0800, Luca Barbato wrote: > >> On 3/10/12 6:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >>> neither the genkernel nor dracut docs have specific instructions > >>> about > >> > >> I guess we could pour more effort in getting dracut more easy to > >> use and/or try to figure out which are the items that should be > >> moved to / and fix the remaining ones... > > > > I highly discourage moving more things to /. If you google for > > things like, "case for usr merge", "understanding bin split", etc, > > you will find much information that is very enlightening about > > the /usr merge and the reasons for the /bin, /lib, /sbin -> /usr/* > > split. > > Indeed. I thought we got past this already and started moving things > to /usr [1][2] > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/398081 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/403073
I've just reported executables which are broken without /usr mounted. Some devs moved them to /usr, others moved libraries to /. -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature