1 |
On 8/15/19 3:19 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> I don't think that's a sane situation, so maybe the eclass should just |
4 |
> die here? (Basically, there are two possibilities: Either, things will |
5 |
> break if the dir is missing, then dying might be the best option. |
6 |
> Or, everything works without the dir, then the ebuild should set it to |
7 |
> /dev/null, in the first place.) |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
That's my feeling as well. In 100% of cases so far, this has been a |
11 |
useful QA tool. Can we wait until that's not the case to change it? |