Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:29:37
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=eB=5wrUhTie04QqtBG=UH=yp413RCFhAKtjMeYhcwqg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code by Mike Frysinger
1 On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >> doing it wrong.  I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
4 >> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source
5 >> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative.
6 >
7 > err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system
8 > includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so
9 > choose.  i think this is a perfectly fine compromise.
10
11 Must be a fairly new compromise - but glad to hear that they've come
12 along a bit.
13
14 Maybe their future Google Earth install package for Linux won't bundle wine. :)
15
16 In any case, I think this really just gets to my point - people who
17 develop FOSS aren't doing it with the express goal of making your life
18 difficult - they just don't always have the same itches. If you help
19 them out or ask NICELY sometimes they'll even help scratch yours.
20
21 Rich