| 1 |
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:56 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On 07:19 Sat 15 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > SITEPACKAGE=/usr/lib/xemacs/site-packages |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > Is using get_libdir() a concern here? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > looks it to me |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Not really, because all the code that gets installed through the |
| 12 |
> eclasses is byte-compiled elisp, which should be arch-independent. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And yes, this should really be moved to /usr/share instead for that |
| 15 |
> reason. Upstream just committed changes for that to their CVS, and it is |
| 16 |
> on my to do list to work out a migration scheme. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
sounds like a good reason to overlook /usr/lib/ abuse then |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives