Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:09:01
Message-Id: robbat2-20150511T194602-284906609Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail by Michael Orlitzky
1 On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:31:51PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 05/11/2015 03:29 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
3 > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:26:01AM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
4 > >> TL;DR: As of May 17, @gentoo.org will drop incoming spammy mail instead of
5 > >> delivering it. Speak now or hold your peace.
6 > >
7 > > Believe me I understand your pain. Been there done that. However,
8 > > dropping mail is never a good idea. You are mucking with the
9 > > dependebility of the email.
10 > Is there some reason a pre-queue filter (with amavisd-new) wouldn't
11 > work? Then we could reject the spammy messages (at SMTP time) instead of
12 > silently dropping them.
13 By drop, I will clarify that they should ideally be rejected at SMTP
14 time, not silently dropped.
15
16 amavis settings for this in theory are:
17 $sa_kill_level_deflt = 20.0;
18 $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 20.0;
19 $sa_crediblefrom_dsn_cutoff_level = 20.0;
20 $final_virus_destiny = D_REJECT;
21 $final_banned_destiny = D_REJECT;
22 $final_spam_destiny = D_REJECT;
23
24 (The other choices are D_PASS, D_BOUNCE, D_DISCARD)
25 D_REJECT is supposed to just reply to the SMTP error.
26
27 It's doing that, but it's ALSO sending a NDN, despite amavis settings to
28 the contrary.
29
30 Here's a quick test, with D_REJECT that show the NDN being sent (and rejected
31 since that address was probably faked).
32
33 May 11 20:00:45 woodpecker postfix/smtpd[21896]: E83DF34098C: client=unknown[183.93.114.52]
34 May 11 20:00:46 woodpecker postfix/cleanup[21836]: E83DF34098C: message-id=<>
35 May 11 20:00:46 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[21745]: E83DF34098C: from=<mldmh@××××××.com>, size=5678, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
36 May 11 20:00:53 woodpecker amavis[21935]: (21935-01) Blocked SPAM {RejectedInbound}, [183.93.114.52]:4758 [183.93.114.52] <mldmh@××××××.com> -> <$DEVNAME@g.o>, Queue-ID: E83DF34098C, mail_id: 6k-hfYzAtEKp, Hits: 26.004, size: 5678, 6812 ms
37 May 11 20:00:53 woodpecker postfix/bounce[21847]: E83DF34098C: sender non-delivery notification: 7ECE534098D
38 May 11 20:00:53 woodpecker postfix/cleanup[21754]: 7ECE534098D: message-id=<20150511200053.7ECE534098D@×××××××××××.org>
39 May 11 20:00:53 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[21745]: 7ECE534098D: from=<>, size=7622, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
40 May 11 20:00:53 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[21745]: E83DF34098C: removed
41 May 11 20:00:53 woodpecker postfix/smtp[21837]: E83DF34098C: to=<$DEVNAME@g.o>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12, delays=4.8/0/0.01/6.8, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 554 5.7.0 Reject, id=21935-01 - spam (in reply to end of DATA command))
42 May 11 20:01:25 woodpecker postfix/qmgr[21745]: 7ECE534098D: removed
43 May 11 20:01:25 woodpecker postfix/smtp[21773]: 7ECE534098D: to=<mldmh@××××××.com>, relay=mxbiz1.qq.com[184.105.206.87]:25, delay=32, delays=0/0/30/1, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host mxbiz1.qq.com[184.105.206.87] said: 550 Mail content denied. http://service.mail.qq.com/cgi-bin/help?subtype=1&&id=20022&&no=1000726 (in reply to end of DATA command))
44
45 --
46 Robin Hugh Johnson
47 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
48 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
49 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>