Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:58:49
Message-Id: 42349B75.10902@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 | On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:49:40 +0100 Adrian Lambeck
6 | <adrian.lambeck@×××××××××.de> wrote:
7 | | Please have a look at it and tell me what you think:
8 | | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0035.html
9 |
10 | Any automatic machine-done changes to ebuilds will break the tree far
11 | more than the occasional developer screwup.
12 |
13
14 It doesn't sound like he's describing something to automatically fix the
15 ebuilds, or I missed that in the document. Seems to me that he's
16 describing enhancements to repoman, and to have repoman run against the
17 tree regularly.
18
19 Mark
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
22 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
23
24 iD8DBQFCNJt1CRZPokWLroQRAgYgAJ9kJa/ZfOJr8VUniXZCJqgXYjfc+gCfUAdJ
25 xZqETSI7VCkSTGR4Ma4F2sU=
26 =1E1l
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development Sami Samhuri <sami@××××××××××.com>