1 |
On 09 Jun 2003 23:52:01 +0200 Christian Aust wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> In gentoo forums I've found this: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> If you are using Portage >= 2.0.48, there is another option for |
6 |
> installing masked packages that does not require editing package.mask. |
7 |
> You can add a category/package entry into the file |
8 |
> /etc/portage/package.unmask, which will survive across an "emerge |
9 |
> sync". |
10 |
> |
11 |
> [http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=33534] |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I've tried it, but it didn't show any effect. Currently this file just |
14 |
> consists of |
15 |
> |
16 |
> sys-devel/gcc-3.3 |
17 |
|
18 |
I've read somewhere that this file only effects packages masked by |
19 |
package.mask in /usr/portage/profiles and not ebuild masked via |
20 |
KEYWORDS. |
21 |
|
22 |
Marius |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |