1 |
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
2 |
> El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: |
3 |
> > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: |
7 |
> > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to |
8 |
> > > keep bluez keyworded. |
9 |
> > > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording |
10 |
> > > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team to |
11 |
> > > unmask that USE flag if possible. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mask |
15 |
> > is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for |
16 |
> > their packages. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Regards, |
19 |
> > Petteri |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> OK, thanks a lot :-D |
24 |
|
25 |
The problem is that hppa team seems to not allow others than they to |
26 |
edit their package.use.mask :-/, is there any special reason for it? |