1 |
Bart Braem posted <e3f37g$uqo$1@×××××××××.org>, excerpted below, on Fri, |
2 |
05 May 2006 10:43:28 +0200: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> Bart Braem wrote: |
7 |
>>> Xorg 7: 5 months |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Can't stabilize till portage 2.1 is stable. Doesn't matter how many open |
10 |
>> bugs we've got, or how well it works. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> Thanks for the explanation. Not that I really like it but I understand |
13 |
> that portage 2.1 is a large upgrade... |
14 |
|
15 |
That of course begs the question of portage 2.1 stabilization. |
16 |
|
17 |
FWIW, as a (mostly) lurker on the portage-devel group/list, I believe |
18 |
it's safe to say that 2.1-rcs are "coming real soon now". There's an |
19 |
active discussion at the moment on whether to base -rc1 on -pre10, which |
20 |
introduced some code cleanups, -pre9, before those cleanups but after the |
21 |
intro of manifest2 (a big target feature that needs included, but that |
22 |
will mean a bit longer to stabilize), or -pre7, before manifest2. Whatever |
23 |
the decision, portage trunk is now feature-frozen until the split is made, |
24 |
so the 2.1 stabilization process is now started. |
25 |
|
26 |
The target is stabilization of 2.1 for Gentoo 2006.1, penciled in for |
27 |
release this (northern hemisphere) summer (July-ish, AFAIK). Assuming |
28 |
that target is hit, Donnie should be able to say whether xorg 7 should |
29 |
stabilize at the same time and be ready for 2006.1 as well, or whether |
30 |
it'll be slightly behind, perhaps 30-days or so -- IOW, whether its 30 day |
31 |
stabilization is in parallel to or occurs after the 30-day stabilization |
32 |
of portage 2.1. |
33 |
|
34 |
In any case, given his statement above and the events from portage-devel, |
35 |
a reasonably safe prediction should be that they'll both be stable by the |
36 |
end of the (northern hemisphere) summer, with a target of mid-summer. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
40 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
41 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
42 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |