1 |
On 10/13/2011 03:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:58:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
>> On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
4 |
>>> Mike Frysinger schrieb: |
5 |
>>>>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the |
8 |
>>>> tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the |
9 |
>>>> depgraph. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> this isn't helping the conversation |
16 |
> -mike |
17 |
|
18 |
you're right. sorry. that came out too harsh. lets rephrase this as: |
19 |
|
20 |
"This /topic should be in the end-quiz, and mentioned in the mentoring |
21 |
guide to cover basis as part of the KEYWORDS visibility handling." |
22 |
|
23 |
- Samuli |