| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> Danny van Dyk napsal(a): |
| 3 |
>> which breaks the metadata cache. Any objections to change it |
| 4 |
>> to |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> SLOT=0 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> As noted on the relevant bug [1], the eclass is a complete no-op and |
| 9 |
> nothing can be installed using this eclass (has been so for quite some |
| 10 |
> time). Fixing it doesn't make sense, making it dummy or even removing it |
| 11 |
> (plus the unusable single ebuild which inherits it) does. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162960 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And we already told you, removing it isn't a good solution (even if it |
| 18 |
technically works within the bounds of the current api). The bug is |
| 19 |
that the SLOT invalidates cache entries and it's trivial to fix. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives