| 1 |
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 11:29, Andreas Waschbuesch wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Hi *, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I just liked to ask, whether there will be those mr-fancy-pants preempt and |
| 8 |
> lockbreak patches from rml back in gentoo's actual kernel or not. I'd like to |
| 9 |
> switch from 2.4.17-r5 and will stick with vanilla + BOTH patches, if it's |
| 10 |
> clear that they won't be included in the nearer future - which would be quite |
| 11 |
> sad - by the way. Any plan? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Just a thought conserning a potential new Gentoo kernel patch... It |
| 14 |
seems rmap and lock-break collides a couple of places. Lock-break was |
| 15 |
written for -aa, and the result of the failed hunks is that some of the |
| 16 |
long locks in the VM aren't "broken". It's no big deal, but it does |
| 17 |
theoretically increase the max. response time. Any bright ideas, except |
| 18 |
mailing RML and wait? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Joachim Blaabjerg |
| 22 |
styx@×××××.org |
| 23 |
www.SuxOS.org |
Archives