| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 24 May 2005 06:34 pm, Jim Northrup wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>of course bb is a space-saver, but i find myself turning the room upside |
| 5 |
>>down for full-static versions of tar, nc and fileutils |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> bb is static and it supports tar, nc, and many fileutils ;) |
| 9 |
> -mike |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If only a little crippled in functionality compared to their full |
| 12 |
equivalents... :-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Although for what BusyBox is... it's a great tool. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 17 |
| Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | |
| 18 |
| Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | |
| 19 |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | |
| 20 |
| I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | |
| 21 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
Archives