| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Freitag, 13. Juni 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi all, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> As discussed in bug #222721, portage has changed the execution order |
| 6 |
>> of phases. It seems the change was introduced in portage-2.1.5 and it |
| 7 |
>> makes that, when upgrading a package, pkg_postinst is run after the |
| 8 |
>> old version has been removed. This breaks packages which use |
| 9 |
>> has_version in pkg_postinst to detect upgrades/downgrades. It can also |
| 10 |
>> break packages in more subtle ways. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So someone that has access permissions here: Please do fix the devmanual |
| 14 |
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/pkg_postinst/index.html |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Santiago M. Mola |
| 22 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives