| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init |
| 4 |
> > systems. Right now it is very tightly integrated with OpenRc, but there |
| 5 |
> > is interest in changing that, so adding openrc to the name would be |
| 6 |
> > misleading eventually. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own name? best-networking? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't know about "best-networking". ;-) One reason we are splitting it |
| 11 |
out also is so it can have its own development/release cycle; the |
| 12 |
oldnet stuff is responsible for about 1/3 of the bugs against OpenRc |
| 13 |
right now, and it is very difficult to test because of all of the |
| 14 |
possibilities. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> However, I do not understand how you can port it without changing the |
| 17 |
> notations... or lowering features... example: rc_net_*_provide, |
| 18 |
> rc_net_*_need, or the rc_config, rc_use, rc_net_*_provide="!net" |
| 19 |
> etc... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Do you think systemd users can understand that /etc/conf.d/net is |
| 22 |
> actually a shell script? I hope this is not going to be eliminated, as |
| 23 |
> I use it a lot. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Robin is going to do most of it I think; I'm not exactly sure what he |
| 26 |
has in mind. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
William |
Archives