1 |
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:58:18 +0100 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:37:20 +0200 |
5 |
> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:05:19 +0000 (UTC) |
7 |
> > "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
9 |
> > > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 13:22:45 +0100 |
10 |
> > > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
11 |
> > > >> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200 |
12 |
> > > >> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> > > >>> Because I'd expect a stage3 to be posix compliant |
14 |
> > > >> |
15 |
> > > >> I agree. It's time to replace nano with Vim. |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > It seems like everyone needs to "chill" a bit. Ciaran wasn't |
18 |
> > > trolling, he was making a point. I'm sure everyone around here |
19 |
> > > understood his point. There were no attacks and no "foul |
20 |
> > > language", so can we move forward? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Constructiveness does not rely on just making points, as replacing |
23 |
> > nano with Vim is out of the context of adding bc back to stage3. |
24 |
> > Editors are a world apart from a build tool, even more so from being |
25 |
> > POSIX. In order to move forward beyond this point, that needs to be |
26 |
> > recognized. |
27 |
|
28 |
Ah, quotes are getting cut out, lovely; it focuses on what is crucial. |