Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:58:06
Message-Id: CAJnmqwYvz6vZr7RJceFy1HLMe9m=tzP-QJRfdXBG49+0R4UXig@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree by Brian Dolbec
1 On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:49:37 -0700
3 > Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >> In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since that's literally
6 >> what purpose it serves. Namely, the cache of the gentoo infra's
7 >> current copy of teh portage tree.
8 >>
9 >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
10 >> wrote:
11 >> >
12 >> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Raymond Jennings
13 >> > <shentino@×××××.com> wrote:
14 >> >>
15 >> >> Just for the record, but would putting a setting inside
16 >> >> /etc/portage/make.conf be the appropriate way to handle this?
17 >> >>
18 >> >
19 >> > The settings already exist (and have existed for 10 years.) This
20 >> > bikeshed discussion is literally trying to decide what the default
21 >> > should be.
22 >> >
23 >> > -A
24 >> >
25 >>
26 >
27 > This is not a personal attack against you. Just picked this one to say
28 > something again...
29 >
30 >
31 > PLEASE, PLEASE stop calling it the "portage" tree. The repo name is
32 > "gentoo". "portage is the default package manager, but not the only
33 > choice. Far too often, it takes awhile to figure out what someone is
34 > trying to say because of that confusion between the tree and the
35 > package manager.
36 >
37 > PLUS, it has been decided already long ago that the directory name
38 > should reflect the repository name. We have been enforcing that rule
39 > for overlays for a long time. It has just been taking a long time to
40 > get our tooling in order so that we can change our own to follow that
41 > rule.
42 >
43 > So, "portage" should not be a directory name in the new default path.
44 >
45 > --
46 > Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
47
48 I don't mind calling ::gentoo as Gentoo's official ebuild repository,
49 but it also has been "a portage tree", and "the portage tree" by
50 default context. If you imply that people should change convention to
51 something more PMS friendly, be explicit, and perhaps make it
52 official, and the let them decide for themselves. Be fair at reminding
53 that it has been there, but it's better be changed for PMS's sake.
54 Don't make it look like the usage has always been wrong.
55
56 --
57 konsolebox

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>