1 |
On Jun 9, 2011 9:27 AM, "Samuli Suominen" <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Autocrazy in effect; disagree with the lead and get removed from the team. |
4 |
|
5 |
So, without trying to comment on the particulars of this situation (of which |
6 |
I'm blissfully unaware beyond being able to guess from recent list traffic), |
7 |
do we need some kind of policy around membership on "special" project teams. |
8 |
QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might be another. |
9 |
|
10 |
Options might include council appointment or council appoints lead who |
11 |
appoints others. Direct election is another route, but I don't like the idea |
12 |
of having 5 annual elections and recalls and all that. Better to elect the |
13 |
top and let them reign in those beneath... |
14 |
|
15 |
I'm not saying that anybody is doing a bad job now, but if people have |
16 |
gripes better to have a proper route of escalation than just bickering |
17 |
on-list. If they get to the top and aren't happy then they can just stew or |
18 |
run for election next term... |
19 |
|
20 |
Rich |