| 1 |
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode |
| 4 |
>> <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is |
| 8 |
>>>>> practically useless. |
| 9 |
>>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his |
| 11 |
>>>>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you |
| 12 |
>>>>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). |
| 13 |
>>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>>> Let's just remove it. |
| 15 |
>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which |
| 18 |
>>>> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to |
| 19 |
>>>> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be |
| 20 |
>>>> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. |
| 21 |
>>>> |
| 22 |
>>> If repoman supported adding a signedoffby line I'd likely use it more |
| 23 |
>>> for commits. Still running repoman full before commit though. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> I do not believe we have an requirement for adding Signed-off-by in |
| 26 |
>> the gentoo repository. Why do you feel the need to do that? |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
> General completeness is all |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part of |
| 32 |
our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the time. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
See https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Gentoo_git_workflow#Sign-Off |
Archives