Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:26:47
Message-Id: 20070330212332.31c1bee7@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis by Roy Marples
1 On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:18 +0100
2 Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> wrote:
3 > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:50:59 +0100
4 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote:
5 > > A few years ago Gentoo had some serious advantages over the
6 > > competition. These days, Gentoo is at serious risk of being Red
7 > > Queened by Ubuntu and Fedora. Providing the same thing that was
8 > > provided two years ago isn't enough. If Portage can't deliver
9 > > functionality that makes Gentoo competitive with where Ubuntu will
10 > > be a year from now, Portage has to be replaced.
11 >
12 > You seem to be under the misapprehension that Portage == Gentoo.
13
14 No no, I'm saying that at present Portage is one of Gentoo's most
15 severe limiting factors.
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@××××××××××××.nz>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>