| 1 |
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:37:42 -0700, "Chris Gianelloni" |
| 2 |
<wolf31o2@g.o> said: |
| 3 |
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:53 -0500, Chris Scullard wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Chris |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Thanks for a level-headed response, Chris. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I think the biggest source of confusion is that few people went to |
| 9 |
> actually read the Council stuff from last meeting. Some points of |
| 10 |
> contention that nobody seems to be getting: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> - Nobody is planning on banning users |
| 13 |
> - Unmoderated mails will be auto-accepted after some timeout |
| 14 |
> - Whatever delay is decided can be imposed on developers, too, if they |
| 15 |
> give reason for it to be enforced on them (read, repeat offenders) |
| 16 |
> - This includes myself and the other Council members |
| 17 |
> - All developers will be able to moderate and all moderation is logged |
| 18 |
> - Developers/users will be able to appeal unfair moderation to devrel, |
| 19 |
> so action can be taken against people who moderate badly |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> That pretty much covers most of the assumptions people are making. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yeah, it covers almost everything I just suggested, except one thing. |
| 24 |
Users who consistently contribute well, or are arch testers or other |
| 25 |
relevant "official" contributors, should be able to skip the delay, |
| 26 |
provided they continue to contribute positively. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Thanks, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thomas Tuttle |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Thomas Tuttle - ttuttle@×××××××.net - http://www.ttuttle.net/ |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives