| 1 |
On 8/5/14, 12:03 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> The bigger problem is actually KEYWORDREQ's so we are going to |
| 3 |
> request maintainers not ever drop ~ppc or ~ppc64 even when they feel |
| 4 |
> a major bump has occurred, eg a deep rewrite to a library. We know |
| 5 |
> this is living dangerously but we'll going to make use of the |
| 6 |
> community in this regard --- either someone will bug us on a broken |
| 7 |
> ~ppc/~ppc64 package, or we'll catch it at stabilization. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
FWIW I don't drop KEYWORDS for bumps considered major. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
However, sometimes a major bump means a new dependency not keyworded for |
| 12 |
given arch, and in that case I would drop KEYWORDS. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Note that most packages I (co-)maintain are not keyworded ~ppc/ppc64, |
| 15 |
but this has happened e.g. for ~arm. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paweł |
Archives