1 |
On Saturday 22 of December 2007 02:41:02 Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> Piotr Jaroszyński kirjoitti: |
3 |
> > This GLEP proposes usage of EAPI-suffixed file extensions for ebuilds |
4 |
> > (for example, foo-1.2.3.ebuild-1). |
5 |
> |
6 |
> It seems many people don't like the idea of having it in the filename |
7 |
|
8 |
Seems you are counting the posts, not the people. |
9 |
|
10 |
> but how about having subdirectories for different eapis. This should |
11 |
> even be faster for the package manager as it can just ignore the |
12 |
> directories it can't understand instead of having to parse the file names. |
13 |
|
14 |
It was already proposed, but didn't seem to get much support. It is equivalent |
15 |
to using the suffixes, but I see it rather as perfomarnce hit, not |
16 |
improvement. The package manger would have to look for ebuilds in the main |
17 |
dir and all the subdirs in case it doesn't have/can't use the cache. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Best Regards, |
21 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |