| 1 |
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:18 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
| 2 |
> Does anyone have any objections to unmasking db 4.6.21? It's been in portage now |
| 3 |
> for a long time, but was quickly masked when some packages had some issues with it. |
| 4 |
> The only remaining package that has an issue that I'm aware of is openldap, and I've |
| 5 |
> submitted a patch that makes openldap just use a lower installed db version. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Any other packages that need looked at, or does anyone else have thoughts or |
| 8 |
> objections? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Most likely it will cause problems for XEmacs, which will probably be |
| 11 |
easy to solve with some configure script tweaking. I've put testing it |
| 12 |
on my todo list. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Kind regards, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hans |
Archives