Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] production vs enterprise and the direction of Gentoo
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:08:41
Message-Id: 1118952289.13606.7.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] production vs enterprise and the direction of Gentoo by kashani
1 On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 12:55 -0500, kashani wrote:
2 > I'm an admin and have only worked in ISP, NSP, hosting, and startup
3 > gigs. These systems tend to be fast moving, customer and feature driven,
4 > and a bit on the bleeding edge. I don't believe any of those
5 > environments fall into what is normally considered "enterprise", but
6 > they are production systems with a premium on flexibility over stability
7 > much like a Linux distribution we all know and love. :)
8
9 Production != Enterprise
10
11 I know what you mean, though. However, you are definitely not the
12 target for any of Gentoo's "Enterprise" efforts, as they are, by design,
13 much slower moving and much less flexible.
14
15 > posting on the forums over a QA department of just me. So rather than
16 > see Gentoo think about doing or not doing enterprise type stuff like
17 > long releases, support contracts, etc I think most of us LAMP, MRTG,
18 > Nagios, BIND, Postfix, Qmail, Postgres, thttpd, Courier, etc geeks would
19 > like "just a bit more stability" rather than the overhead that comes
20 > with enterprise features.
21
22 Honestly, the more bleeding edge it is, the less quality that is going
23 to be associated with it, simply due to new features and other such
24 things that will not have gotten as much testing/bug-fixing as the more
25 stable features. Unless we have our own audit team specifically looking
26 for bugs and fixing them *before they are reported* then there isn't
27 much we can do to resolve this situation.
28
29 > To be honest /etc/portage/* tends be enough control for me, but I've
30 > been doing admin work for 9 years. And I've got a test environment that
31 > I use religiously. I do however answer a lot of questions in the Network
32 > and Security forum where up and coming admins aren't so lucky. I don't
33 > think any of us expect a foolproof system, but there is room for a bit
34 > more stability that'll benefit all users... especially admins. :)
35
36 That is one of the problems we have here at Gentoo. We provide ways of
37 doing things that you want to do. Sometimes the methods are very
38 simple, other times, we expect you to know what you're doing. The real
39 problem we have is how to balance between the "do everything for the
40 user" approach of some distributions and the "don't do a damn thing and
41 then let the user RTFM" approach that is a bit more common with Gentoo.
42 Personally, I think we simply need to make sure things get documented
43 well and leave it up to the community to provide the "support", as it
44 were. This has worked quite well for Gentoo, and tends to tighten the
45 bond between users and developers.
46
47 --
48 Chris Gianelloni
49 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
50 Games - Developer
51 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature