| 1 |
El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 08:13 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 2 |
> El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 4 |
> > <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Pacho Ramos schrieb: |
| 6 |
> > >>>>>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, |
| 7 |
> > >>>>>> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for |
| 8 |
> > >>>>>> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain |
| 9 |
> > >>>>>> them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least, |
| 10 |
> > >>>>>> reflect reality. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > >> Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you |
| 13 |
> > >> send me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also, |
| 14 |
> > >> maybe telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is |
| 15 |
> > >> basically gnome team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome |
| 16 |
> > >> team ;)) |
| 17 |
> > > |
| 18 |
> > > There is now one proxy maintainer for a couple of packages, he is |
| 19 |
> > > currently waiting for voip overlay access in bug 437538. He will take |
| 20 |
> > > care of linphone and related packages (see bug 399735 and its |
| 21 |
> > > dependencies). |
| 22 |
> > > |
| 23 |
> > > Regarding the packages that can be moved to maintainer-needed: I think |
| 24 |
> > > a good heuristic is if the package has several open bugs with no |
| 25 |
> > > maintainer reaction, and hasn't been touched by anyone from voip herd |
| 26 |
> > > in over a year. This would include the ekiga, opal and yate packages |
| 27 |
> > > mentioned above. |
| 28 |
> > > |
| 29 |
> > I'd gladly take maintainership of opal and ekiga, if nobody wants them. |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > Cheers, |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Would be nice as they need a lot of bumps and pending work |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Looks like finally you added yourself to metadata but with instructions |
| 38 |
to bug-wranglers to CC you and assign to herd. I would like to confirm |
| 39 |
this way of assigning things with both as voip herd people didn't touch |
| 40 |
ekiga related packages and, also, would be better to clarify things |
| 41 |
before me going to their bugs and assigning them properly to comply |
| 42 |
current metadatas (as I have seen some ekiga bugs still only assigned to |
| 43 |
voip herd without you CCed) |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Thanks |
Archives