Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | ||
| Date: | Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:50:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140126005044.29566.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | > My point being... yes indeed, there's a LOT of folks for whom gentoo |
| 3 | > without a stable tree would be a gentoo freed of a to-them useless |
| 4 | > weight, allowing gentoo to move even faster, and be even better in areas |
| 5 | > that are already its strength, heavily automated leading edge releases |
| 6 | > and live-development level packages. And I'm one of those folks! |
| 7 | |
| 8 | +1 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | //Peter |