| 1 |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:10:43 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/13/2014 01:13 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Michael Palimaka |
| 4 |
> > <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> On 14/11/14 01:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>> Isn't it possible to disable C++ in GCC with USE="-cxx"? |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> It is, but I think if that's disabled you're on your own. :-) |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Perhaps we should add a package.use.force entry for this. Is there any |
| 11 |
> > reason not to? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Under the assumption that gcc[cxx] is needed for the package manager, |
| 15 |
> you still only need *one* GCC with C++ support. You could have another |
| 16 |
> slot without C++ for testing or whatever. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Seconded. Simple practical example (aside from testing) from my |
| 19 |
system: I need libg2c.so for old crappy fortran software I have to |
| 20 |
use. That's why I'm keeping sys-devel:3.4[fortran nls] around. I |
| 21 |
definitely do not need cxx flag here. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives