| 1 |
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:45:29 -0500 |
| 2 |
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 5 |
> > It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are |
| 6 |
> > already available. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> So, if bugs are being fixed why is there a need to fix something that |
| 9 |
> isn't broken with regards to a policy _needed_ to enforce this |
| 10 |
> action? Are bugs being ignored or RESOLVED, WONTFIX? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Hypothetically, if there was such a policy and there was 100's of |
| 13 |
> bugs filed with patches (maintainers should handle the patches |
| 14 |
> anyway) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"Should" being the keyword here. Also assumes that all packages are |
| 17 |
actually maintained. I guess the wording of the original request should |
| 18 |
have been more like "is anyone against QA fixing packages that ignore |
| 19 |
LDFLAGS?". |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Marius |
Archives