1 |
2018-02-03 13:16 GMT+01:00 mudler <mudler@g.o>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi everyone, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> This is an idea that has been floating around already, as some of you |
7 |
> already know, openQA [1] is a project that provides the ability to fully |
8 |
> test O.S. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
Being used to routinely build Gentoo profiles, this idea is one of the |
12 |
first to pop up, indeed. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
> |
16 |
> I'd like to bring openQA to Gentoo, and start using it for both testing, |
17 |
> and maybe, if promising at it seems, using it to automatize even more |
18 |
> our testing workflow and help stabilization processes. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
simply Great. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
> |
25 |
> I'm creating a new project for this, the aim is first to provide ebuilds |
26 |
> for openQA, and meanwhile writing test cases that can be used to test |
27 |
> Gentoo inside it. As i see it, it would be really helpful exp. regarding |
28 |
> testing DEs and track back regressions as well [2], it offers also |
29 |
> integrations with bugzilla. |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
One of the first things noticed when trying to achieve full testing is that |
33 |
it's a gigantic work. Suse seem to have a really good framework that |
34 |
surely costed a lot to build. |
35 |
How much can be reused of that work? |
36 |
What are the differences, in features and building blocks expected for a |
37 |
gentoo implementation? |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
> |
41 |
> Development plan and goals will be updated to the Project page soon [3] |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> What do you think? |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
That's a difficult objective worth the effort to achieve it |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
> |
51 |
> Best, |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Ettore |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> 1: http://open.qa/ |
57 |
> |
58 |
> 2: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/600283 |
59 |
> |
60 |
> 3: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:OpenQA |
61 |
> |
62 |
> |
63 |
> |