| 1 |
On 06/20/2013 05:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the |
| 7 |
>>>>> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. |
| 8 |
>>>> Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you point me to it, please? |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Just something I picked up from various IRC conversations with mgorny |
| 12 |
>>> and pals. More precisely, I should say it was the eclass author's |
| 13 |
>>> intent, and it is a principle with which I personally agree. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> The eclass authors opinion is not a policy. Policies must be discussed. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I missed the part where anyone mentioned a policy... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I did... and by that I mean: let's discuss it! :D |
Archives