1 |
On Saturday, May 5, 2007 04:14:25 PM Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> > Currently, there are two news item in the Paludis overlay. Unless |
3 |
> > earlier ones were removed, those two seem to be a fairly small sample |
4 |
> > to deduce anything from. |
5 |
> They were. |
6 |
|
7 |
How many news items did you issue? (It's probably easier for you to say |
8 |
instead of me searching the entire history of the overlay. :-) ) |
9 |
|
10 |
> > Furthermore, GLEP42 states: |
11 |
> > "News items must only be for important changes that may cause serious |
12 |
> > upgrade or compatibility problems. Ordinary upgrade messages and |
13 |
> > non-critical news items should remain in einfo notices." |
14 |
[...] |
15 |
> This is sufficiently important to Paludis users that Paludis users |
16 |
> should see a news item for it. |
17 |
|
18 |
Which are those "serious upgrade or compatibility problems" you're trying |
19 |
to avoid? Paludis warned about the change at runtime only. For "serious |
20 |
problems" I'm sure you'd make it error out, wouldn't you? |
21 |
|
22 |
> > The real problem with issuing news items for trivial changes is that |
23 |
> > people will just start marking such news items read without really |
24 |
> > reading them or even stop synching news items completely. |
25 |
> This is not a trivial change. |
26 |
|
27 |
(Could you please try to argument instead of just making statements?) |
28 |
|
29 |
The old configuration format still works. Thus, from a user's point of |
30 |
view, it is a trivial change. |
31 |
|
32 |
I agree with you that both from the POV of a Paludis dev as well as that |
33 |
of a Gentoo dev it's not trivial because it allows for better granularity |
34 |
when selecting subsets of packages. |
35 |
|
36 |
> > Then, elog and friends would be fully sufficient for informing users |
37 |
> > about such configuration changes - under the circumstances of this |
38 |
> > case at least. |
39 |
> We already know from similar cases that this isn't true. |
40 |
|
41 |
Yes, you've been repeating that over and over. At least one example would |
42 |
probably help to understand the point you're trying to make. |
43 |
|
44 |
Best regards, Wulf |