Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke7jr@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Jay Maynard <jmaynard@××××××××.cx>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:41:23
Message-Id: 200402251340.50215.luke7jr@yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license by Jay Maynard
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Wednesday 25 February 2004 01:35 pm, Jay Maynard wrote:
5 > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:12:10PM +0100, John Nilsson wrote:
6 > > Because of this decision, the GNU system is not the same as the
7 > > collection of all GNU software. The GNU system includes programs that
8 > > are not GNU software, programs that were developed by other people and
9 > > projects for their own purposes, but which we can use because they are
10 > > free software." - Richard Stallman
11 > > (http://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html)
12 > This is as morally reprehensible as SCO's claim that anything any of their
13 > licensees wrote for their Unix distributions is part of Unix.
14 You realize that the only difference between that description and what distros
15 do is that GNU wrote more of the core OS? Are you going to apply the same
16 statement to Gentoo, RedHat, and all the other distros who have written even
17 *less* of their OS's software?
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
20
21 iD8DBQFAPKXfZl/BHdU+lYMRAjWNAJ9Hmqhqm5qUorGeO+jrfVaCZbrhBACffrM2
22 0etadMxk6GAeDgxSH8U6F4Y=
23 =6u8G
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license Jay Maynard <jmaynard@××××××××.cx>