| 1 |
On Friday, September 17, 2010 01:06:19 Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 2 |
> В Чтв, 16/09/2010 в 18:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: |
| 3 |
> > On Thursday, September 16, 2010 15:41:27 Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > В Чтв, 16/09/2010 в 15:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: |
| 5 |
> > > > > FOX_PV="${FOX_PV:-${PV}}" |
| 6 |
> > > > |
| 7 |
> > > > while you're here, i'd change to: |
| 8 |
> > > > : ${FOX_PV:=${PV}} |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Why? This looks less readable... |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > only because your eyes arent tuned to it |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Instead of explicit variable assignment (what was intended) you suggest |
| 15 |
> to call `:` command and implicitly assign variable with bash parameter |
| 16 |
> expansion... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
what exactly is your point ? there is no performance difference. my style |
| 19 |
suggestion however is significantly more compact and has no redundancy. |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives